~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.rst

Version: ~ [ linux-6.12-rc7 ] ~ [ linux-6.11.7 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.60 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.116 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.171 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.229 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.285 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.323 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.12 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

Diff markup

Differences between /Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.rst (Version linux-6.12-rc7) and /Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.rst (Version linux-4.14.336)


  1 .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0               
  2                                                   
  3 =================                                 
  4 Lockdep-RCU Splat                                 
  5 =================                                 
  6                                                   
  7 Lockdep-RCU was added to the Linux kernel in e    
  8 (http://lwn.net/Articles/371986/).  This facil    
  9 misuses of the RCU API, most notably using one    
 10 family to access an RCU-protected pointer with    
 11 When such misuse is detected, an lockdep-RCU s    
 12                                                   
 13 The usual cause of a lockdep-RCU splat is some    
 14 RCU-protected data structure without either (1    
 15 RCU read-side critical section or (2) holding     
 16 This problem can therefore be serious: it migh    
 17 overwriting or worse.  There can of course be     
 18 being the real world and all that.                
 19                                                   
 20 So let's look at an example RCU lockdep splat     
 21 has long since been fixed::                       
 22                                                   
 23     =============================                 
 24     WARNING: suspicious RCU usage                 
 25     -----------------------------                 
 26     block/cfq-iosched.c:2776 suspicious rcu_de    
 27                                                   
 28 other info that might help us debug this::        
 29                                                   
 30     rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0     
 31     3 locks held by scsi_scan_6/1552:             
 32     #0:  (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<fff    
 33     scsi_scan_host_selected+0x5a/0x150            
 34     #1:  (&eq->sysfs_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffff    
 35     elevator_exit+0x22/0x60                       
 36     #2:  (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, a    
 37     cfq_exit_queue+0x43/0x190                     
 38                                                   
 39     stack backtrace:                              
 40     Pid: 1552, comm: scsi_scan_6 Not tainted 3    
 41     Call Trace:                                   
 42     [<ffffffff810abb9b>] lockdep_rcu_dereferen    
 43     [<ffffffff812b6139>] __cfq_exit_single_io_    
 44     [<ffffffff812b626c>] cfq_exit_queue+0x7c/0    
 45     [<ffffffff812a5046>] elevator_exit+0x36/0x    
 46     [<ffffffff812a802a>] blk_cleanup_queue+0x4    
 47     [<ffffffff8145cc09>] scsi_free_queue+0x9/0    
 48     [<ffffffff81460944>] __scsi_remove_device+    
 49     [<ffffffff8145dca3>] scsi_probe_and_add_lu    
 50     [<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb    
 51     [<ffffffff817d98ed>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_ir    
 52     [<ffffffff8145e722>] __scsi_scan_target+0x    
 53     [<ffffffff812c690d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_    
 54     [<ffffffff817da069>] ? error_exit+0x29/0xb    
 55     [<ffffffff812bcc60>] ? kobject_del+0x40/0x    
 56     [<ffffffff8145ed16>] scsi_scan_channel+0x8    
 57     [<ffffffff8145f0b0>] scsi_scan_host_select    
 58     [<ffffffff8145f149>] do_scsi_scan_host+0x8    
 59     [<ffffffff8145f170>] do_scan_async+0x20/0x    
 60     [<ffffffff8145f150>] ? do_scsi_scan_host+0    
 61     [<ffffffff810975b6>] kthread+0xa6/0xb0        
 62     [<ffffffff817db154>] kernel_thread_helper+    
 63     [<ffffffff81066430>] ? finish_task_switch+    
 64     [<ffffffff817d9c04>] ? retint_restore_args    
 65     [<ffffffff81097510>] ? __kthread_init_work    
 66     [<ffffffff817db150>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb      
 67                                                   
 68 Line 2776 of block/cfq-iosched.c in v3.0-rc5 i    
 69                                                   
 70         if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) ==     
 71                                                   
 72 This form says that it must be in a plain vani    
 73 section, but the "other info" list above shows    
 74 case.  Instead, we hold three locks, one of wh    
 75 And maybe that lock really does protect this r    
 76 is to inform RCU, perhaps by changing __cfq_ex    
 77 take the struct request_queue "q" from cfq_exi    
 78 which would permit us to invoke rcu_dereferenc    
 79                                                   
 80         if (rcu_dereference_protected(ioc->ioc    
 81                                       lockdep_    
 82                                                   
 83 With this change, there would be no lockdep-RC    
 84 code was invoked either from within an RCU rea    
 85 or with the ->queue_lock held.  In particular,    
 86 the above lockdep-RCU splat because ->queue_lo    
 87 list above).                                      
 88                                                   
 89 On the other hand, perhaps we really do need a    
 90 section.  In this case, the critical section m    
 91 return value from rcu_dereference(), or at lea    
 92 reference count incremented or some such.  One    
 93 add rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() as f    
 94                                                   
 95         rcu_read_lock();                          
 96         if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) ==     
 97                 spin_lock(&ioc->lock);            
 98                 rcu_assign_pointer(ioc->ioc_da    
 99                 spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);          
100         }                                         
101         rcu_read_unlock();                        
102                                                   
103 With this change, the rcu_dereference() is alw    
104 read-side critical section, which again would     
105 above lockdep-RCU splat.                          
106                                                   
107 But in this particular case, we don't actually    
108 returned from rcu_dereference().  Instead, tha    
109 to the cic pointer, which means that the rcu_d    
110 by rcu_access_pointer() as follows::              
111                                                   
112         if (rcu_access_pointer(ioc->ioc_data)     
113                                                   
114 Because it is legal to invoke rcu_access_point    
115 this change would also suppress the above lock    
                                                      

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php