~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst

Version: ~ [ linux-6.11.5 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.58 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.114 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.169 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.228 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.284 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.322 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.9 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

Diff markup

Differences between /Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst (Architecture m68k) and /Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst (Architecture alpha)


  1 =========================================           1 =========================================
  2 I915 GuC Submission/DRM Scheduler Section           2 I915 GuC Submission/DRM Scheduler Section
  3 =========================================           3 =========================================
  4                                                     4 
  5 Upstream plan                                       5 Upstream plan
  6 =============                                       6 =============
  7 For upstream the overall plan for landing GuC       7 For upstream the overall plan for landing GuC submission and integrating the
  8 i915 with the DRM scheduler is:                     8 i915 with the DRM scheduler is:
  9                                                     9 
 10 * Merge basic GuC submission                       10 * Merge basic GuC submission
 11         * Basic submission support for all gen     11         * Basic submission support for all gen11+ platforms
 12         * Not enabled by default on any curren     12         * Not enabled by default on any current platforms but can be enabled via
 13           modparam enable_guc                      13           modparam enable_guc
 14         * Lots of rework will need to be done      14         * Lots of rework will need to be done to integrate with DRM scheduler so
 15           no need to nit pick everything in th     15           no need to nit pick everything in the code, it just should be
 16           functional, no major coding style /      16           functional, no major coding style / layering errors, and not regress
 17           execlists                                17           execlists
 18         * Update IGTs / selftests as needed to     18         * Update IGTs / selftests as needed to work with GuC submission
 19         * Enable CI on supported platforms for     19         * Enable CI on supported platforms for a baseline
 20         * Rework / get CI heathly for GuC subm     20         * Rework / get CI heathly for GuC submission in place as needed
 21 * Merge new parallel submission uAPI               21 * Merge new parallel submission uAPI
 22         * Bonding uAPI completely incompatible     22         * Bonding uAPI completely incompatible with GuC submission, plus it has
 23           severe design issues in general, whi     23           severe design issues in general, which is why we want to retire it no
 24           matter what                              24           matter what
 25         * New uAPI adds I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_E     25         * New uAPI adds I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL context setup step
 26           which configures a slot with N conte     26           which configures a slot with N contexts
 27         * After I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARAL     27         * After I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL a user can submit N batches to
 28           a slot in a single execbuf IOCTL and     28           a slot in a single execbuf IOCTL and the batches run on the GPU in
 29           paralllel                                29           paralllel
 30         * Initially only for GuC submission bu     30         * Initially only for GuC submission but execlists can be supported if
 31           needed                                   31           needed
 32 * Convert the i915 to use the DRM scheduler        32 * Convert the i915 to use the DRM scheduler
 33         * GuC submission backend fully integra     33         * GuC submission backend fully integrated with DRM scheduler
 34                 * All request queues removed f     34                 * All request queues removed from backend (e.g. all backpressure
 35                   handled in DRM scheduler)        35                   handled in DRM scheduler)
 36                 * Resets / cancels hook in DRM     36                 * Resets / cancels hook in DRM scheduler
 37                 * Watchdog hooks into DRM sche     37                 * Watchdog hooks into DRM scheduler
 38                 * Lots of complexity of the Gu     38                 * Lots of complexity of the GuC backend can be pulled out once
 39                   integrated with DRM schedule     39                   integrated with DRM scheduler (e.g. state machine gets
 40                   simpler, locking gets simple     40                   simpler, locking gets simpler, etc...)
 41         * Execlists backend will minimum requi     41         * Execlists backend will minimum required to hook in the DRM scheduler
 42                 * Legacy interface                 42                 * Legacy interface
 43                 * Features like timeslicing /      43                 * Features like timeslicing / preemption / virtual engines would
 44                   be difficult to integrate wi     44                   be difficult to integrate with the DRM scheduler and these
 45                   features are not required fo     45                   features are not required for GuC submission as the GuC does
 46                   these things for us              46                   these things for us
 47                 * ROI low on fully integrating     47                 * ROI low on fully integrating into DRM scheduler
 48                 * Fully integrating would add      48                 * Fully integrating would add lots of complexity to DRM
 49                   scheduler                        49                   scheduler
 50         * Port i915 priority inheritance / boo     50         * Port i915 priority inheritance / boosting feature in DRM scheduler
 51                 * Used for i915 page flip, may     51                 * Used for i915 page flip, may be useful to other DRM drivers as
 52                   well                             52                   well
 53                 * Will be an optional feature      53                 * Will be an optional feature in the DRM scheduler
 54         * Remove in-order completion assumptio     54         * Remove in-order completion assumptions from DRM scheduler
 55                 * Even when using the DRM sche     55                 * Even when using the DRM scheduler the backends will handle
 56                   preemption, timeslicing, etc     56                   preemption, timeslicing, etc... so it is possible for jobs to
 57                   finish out of order              57                   finish out of order
 58         * Pull out i915 priority levels and us     58         * Pull out i915 priority levels and use DRM priority levels
 59         * Optimize DRM scheduler as needed         59         * Optimize DRM scheduler as needed
 60                                                    60 
 61 TODOs for GuC submission upstream                  61 TODOs for GuC submission upstream
 62 =================================                  62 =================================
 63                                                    63 
 64 * Need an update to GuC firmware / i915 to ena     64 * Need an update to GuC firmware / i915 to enable error state capture
 65 * Open source tool to decode GuC logs              65 * Open source tool to decode GuC logs
 66 * Public GuC spec                                  66 * Public GuC spec
 67                                                    67 
 68 New uAPI for basic GuC submission                  68 New uAPI for basic GuC submission
 69 =================================                  69 =================================
 70 No major changes are required to the uAPI for      70 No major changes are required to the uAPI for basic GuC submission. The only
 71 change is a new scheduler attribute: I915_SCHE     71 change is a new scheduler attribute: I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_STATIC_PRIORITY_MAP.
 72 This attribute indicates the 2k i915 user prio     72 This attribute indicates the 2k i915 user priority levels are statically mapped
 73 into 3 levels as follows:                          73 into 3 levels as follows:
 74                                                    74 
 75 * -1k to -1 Low priority                           75 * -1k to -1 Low priority
 76 * 0 Medium priority                                76 * 0 Medium priority
 77 * 1 to 1k High priority                            77 * 1 to 1k High priority
 78                                                    78 
 79 This is needed because the GuC only has 4 prio     79 This is needed because the GuC only has 4 priority bands. The highest priority
 80 band is reserved with the kernel. This aligns      80 band is reserved with the kernel. This aligns with the DRM scheduler priority
 81 levels too.                                        81 levels too.
 82                                                    82 
 83 Spec references:                                   83 Spec references:
 84 ----------------                                   84 ----------------
 85 * https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensi     85 * https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensions/IMG/EGL_IMG_context_priority.txt
 86 * https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/spec     86 * https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/specs/1.2-extensions/html/chap5.html#devsandqueues-priority
 87 * https://spec.oneapi.com/level-zero/latest/co     87 * https://spec.oneapi.com/level-zero/latest/core/api.html#ze-command-queue-priority-t
 88                                                    88 
 89 New parallel submission uAPI                       89 New parallel submission uAPI
 90 ============================                       90 ============================
 91 The existing bonding uAPI is completely broken     91 The existing bonding uAPI is completely broken with GuC submission because
 92 whether a submission is a single context submi     92 whether a submission is a single context submit or parallel submit isn't known
 93 until execbuf time activated via the I915_SUBM     93 until execbuf time activated via the I915_SUBMIT_FENCE. To submit multiple
 94 contexts in parallel with the GuC the context      94 contexts in parallel with the GuC the context must be explicitly registered with
 95 N contexts and all N contexts must be submitte     95 N contexts and all N contexts must be submitted in a single command to the GuC.
 96 The GuC interfaces do not support dynamically      96 The GuC interfaces do not support dynamically changing between N contexts as the
 97 bonding uAPI does. Hence the need for a new pa     97 bonding uAPI does. Hence the need for a new parallel submission interface. Also
 98 the legacy bonding uAPI is quite confusing and     98 the legacy bonding uAPI is quite confusing and not intuitive at all. Furthermore
 99 I915_SUBMIT_FENCE is by design a future fence,     99 I915_SUBMIT_FENCE is by design a future fence, so not really something we should
100 continue to support.                              100 continue to support.
101                                                   101 
102 The new parallel submission uAPI consists of 3    102 The new parallel submission uAPI consists of 3 parts:
103                                                   103 
104 * Export engines logical mapping                  104 * Export engines logical mapping
105 * A 'set_parallel' extension to configure cont    105 * A 'set_parallel' extension to configure contexts for parallel
106   submission                                      106   submission
107 * Extend execbuf2 IOCTL to support submitting     107 * Extend execbuf2 IOCTL to support submitting N BBs in a single IOCTL
108                                                   108 
109 Export engines logical mapping                    109 Export engines logical mapping
110 ------------------------------                    110 ------------------------------
111 Certain use cases require BBs to be placed on     111 Certain use cases require BBs to be placed on engine instances in logical order
112 (e.g. split-frame on gen11+). The logical mapp    112 (e.g. split-frame on gen11+). The logical mapping of engine instances can change
113 based on fusing. Rather than making UMDs be aw    113 based on fusing. Rather than making UMDs be aware of fusing, simply expose the
114 logical mapping with the existing query engine    114 logical mapping with the existing query engine info IOCTL. Also the GuC
115 submission interface currently only supports s    115 submission interface currently only supports submitting multiple contexts to
116 engines in logical order which is a new requir    116 engines in logical order which is a new requirement compared to execlists.
117 Lastly, all current platforms have at most 2 e    117 Lastly, all current platforms have at most 2 engine instances and the logical
118 order is the same as uAPI order. This will cha    118 order is the same as uAPI order. This will change on platforms with more than 2
119 engine instances.                                 119 engine instances.
120                                                   120 
121 A single bit will be added to drm_i915_engine_    121 A single bit will be added to drm_i915_engine_info.flags indicating that the
122 logical instance has been returned and a new f    122 logical instance has been returned and a new field,
123 drm_i915_engine_info.logical_instance, returns    123 drm_i915_engine_info.logical_instance, returns the logical instance.
124                                                   124 
125 A 'set_parallel' extension to configure contex    125 A 'set_parallel' extension to configure contexts for parallel submission
126 ----------------------------------------------    126 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
127 The 'set_parallel' extension configures a slot    127 The 'set_parallel' extension configures a slot for parallel submission of N BBs.
128 It is a setup step that must be called before     128 It is a setup step that must be called before using any of the contexts. See
129 I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_LOAD_BALANCE or I915_    129 I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_LOAD_BALANCE or I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_BOND for
130 similar existing examples. Once a slot is conf    130 similar existing examples. Once a slot is configured for parallel submission the
131 execbuf2 IOCTL can be called submitting N BBs     131 execbuf2 IOCTL can be called submitting N BBs in a single IOCTL. Initially only
132 supports GuC submission. Execlists supports ca    132 supports GuC submission. Execlists supports can be added later if needed.
133                                                   133 
134 Add I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL_SUBMIT a    134 Add I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL_SUBMIT and
135 drm_i915_context_engines_parallel_submit to th    135 drm_i915_context_engines_parallel_submit to the uAPI to implement this
136 extension.                                        136 extension.
137                                                   137 
138 .. c:namespace-push:: rfc                         138 .. c:namespace-push:: rfc
139                                                   139 
140 .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h       140 .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
141         :functions: i915_context_engines_paral    141         :functions: i915_context_engines_parallel_submit
142                                                   142 
143 .. c:namespace-pop::                              143 .. c:namespace-pop::
144                                                   144 
145 Extend execbuf2 IOCTL to support submitting N     145 Extend execbuf2 IOCTL to support submitting N BBs in a single IOCTL
146 ----------------------------------------------    146 -------------------------------------------------------------------
147 Contexts that have been configured with the 's    147 Contexts that have been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension can only
148 submit N BBs in a single execbuf2 IOCTL. The B    148 submit N BBs in a single execbuf2 IOCTL. The BBs are either the last N objects
149 in the drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 list or the f    149 in the drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 list or the first N if I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST is
150 set. The number of BBs is implicit based on th    150 set. The number of BBs is implicit based on the slot submitted and how it has
151 been configured by 'set_parallel' or other ext    151 been configured by 'set_parallel' or other extensions. No uAPI changes are
152 required to the execbuf2 IOCTL.                   152 required to the execbuf2 IOCTL.
                                                      

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php