~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst

Version: ~ [ linux-6.11.5 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.58 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.114 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.169 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.228 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.284 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.322 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.9 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

  1 .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  2 
  3 .. _fsverity:
  4 
  5 =======================================================
  6 fs-verity: read-only file-based authenticity protection
  7 =======================================================
  8 
  9 Introduction
 10 ============
 11 
 12 fs-verity (``fs/verity/``) is a support layer that filesystems can
 13 hook into to support transparent integrity and authenticity protection
 14 of read-only files.  Currently, it is supported by the ext4, f2fs, and
 15 btrfs filesystems.  Like fscrypt, not too much filesystem-specific
 16 code is needed to support fs-verity.
 17 
 18 fs-verity is similar to `dm-verity
 19 <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/device-mapper/verity.txt>`_
 20 but works on files rather than block devices.  On regular files on
 21 filesystems supporting fs-verity, userspace can execute an ioctl that
 22 causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for the file and persist
 23 it to a filesystem-specific location associated with the file.
 24 
 25 After this, the file is made readonly, and all reads from the file are
 26 automatically verified against the file's Merkle tree.  Reads of any
 27 corrupted data, including mmap reads, will fail.
 28 
 29 Userspace can use another ioctl to retrieve the root hash (actually
 30 the "fs-verity file digest", which is a hash that includes the Merkle
 31 tree root hash) that fs-verity is enforcing for the file.  This ioctl
 32 executes in constant time, regardless of the file size.
 33 
 34 fs-verity is essentially a way to hash a file in constant time,
 35 subject to the caveat that reads which would violate the hash will
 36 fail at runtime.
 37 
 38 Use cases
 39 =========
 40 
 41 By itself, fs-verity only provides integrity protection, i.e.
 42 detection of accidental (non-malicious) corruption.
 43 
 44 However, because fs-verity makes retrieving the file hash extremely
 45 efficient, it's primarily meant to be used as a tool to support
 46 authentication (detection of malicious modifications) or auditing
 47 (logging file hashes before use).
 48 
 49 A standard file hash could be used instead of fs-verity.  However,
 50 this is inefficient if the file is large and only a small portion may
 51 be accessed.  This is often the case for Android application package
 52 (APK) files, for example.  These typically contain many translations,
 53 classes, and other resources that are infrequently or even never
 54 accessed on a particular device.  It would be slow and wasteful to
 55 read and hash the entire file before starting the application.
 56 
 57 Unlike an ahead-of-time hash, fs-verity also re-verifies data each
 58 time it's paged in.  This ensures that malicious disk firmware can't
 59 undetectably change the contents of the file at runtime.
 60 
 61 fs-verity does not replace or obsolete dm-verity.  dm-verity should
 62 still be used on read-only filesystems.  fs-verity is for files that
 63 must live on a read-write filesystem because they are independently
 64 updated and potentially user-installed, so dm-verity cannot be used.
 65 
 66 fs-verity does not mandate a particular scheme for authenticating its
 67 file hashes.  (Similarly, dm-verity does not mandate a particular
 68 scheme for authenticating its block device root hashes.)  Options for
 69 authenticating fs-verity file hashes include:
 70 
 71 - Trusted userspace code.  Often, the userspace code that accesses
 72   files can be trusted to authenticate them.  Consider e.g. an
 73   application that wants to authenticate data files before using them,
 74   or an application loader that is part of the operating system (which
 75   is already authenticated in a different way, such as by being loaded
 76   from a read-only partition that uses dm-verity) and that wants to
 77   authenticate applications before loading them.  In these cases, this
 78   trusted userspace code can authenticate a file's contents by
 79   retrieving its fs-verity digest using `FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_, then
 80   verifying a signature of it using any userspace cryptographic
 81   library that supports digital signatures.
 82 
 83 - Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA).  IMA supports fs-verity
 84   file digests as an alternative to its traditional full file digests.
 85   "IMA appraisal" enforces that files contain a valid, matching
 86   signature in their "security.ima" extended attribute, as controlled
 87   by the IMA policy.  For more information, see the IMA documentation.
 88 
 89 - Trusted userspace code in combination with `Built-in signature
 90   verification`_.  This approach should be used only with great care.
 91 
 92 User API
 93 ========
 94 
 95 FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY
 96 --------------------
 97 
 98 The FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl enables fs-verity on a file.  It takes
 99 in a pointer to a struct fsverity_enable_arg, defined as
100 follows::
101 
102     struct fsverity_enable_arg {
103             __u32 version;
104             __u32 hash_algorithm;
105             __u32 block_size;
106             __u32 salt_size;
107             __u64 salt_ptr;
108             __u32 sig_size;
109             __u32 __reserved1;
110             __u64 sig_ptr;
111             __u64 __reserved2[11];
112     };
113 
114 This structure contains the parameters of the Merkle tree to build for
115 the file.  It must be initialized as follows:
116 
117 - ``version`` must be 1.
118 - ``hash_algorithm`` must be the identifier for the hash algorithm to
119   use for the Merkle tree, such as FS_VERITY_HASH_ALG_SHA256.  See
120   ``include/uapi/linux/fsverity.h`` for the list of possible values.
121 - ``block_size`` is the Merkle tree block size, in bytes.  In Linux
122   v6.3 and later, this can be any power of 2 between (inclusively)
123   1024 and the minimum of the system page size and the filesystem
124   block size.  In earlier versions, the page size was the only allowed
125   value.
126 - ``salt_size`` is the size of the salt in bytes, or 0 if no salt is
127   provided.  The salt is a value that is prepended to every hashed
128   block; it can be used to personalize the hashing for a particular
129   file or device.  Currently the maximum salt size is 32 bytes.
130 - ``salt_ptr`` is the pointer to the salt, or NULL if no salt is
131   provided.
132 - ``sig_size`` is the size of the builtin signature in bytes, or 0 if no
133   builtin signature is provided.  Currently the builtin signature is
134   (somewhat arbitrarily) limited to 16128 bytes.
135 - ``sig_ptr``  is the pointer to the builtin signature, or NULL if no
136   builtin signature is provided.  A builtin signature is only needed
137   if the `Built-in signature verification`_ feature is being used.  It
138   is not needed for IMA appraisal, and it is not needed if the file
139   signature is being handled entirely in userspace.
140 - All reserved fields must be zeroed.
141 
142 FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for
143 the file and persist it to a filesystem-specific location associated
144 with the file, then mark the file as a verity file.  This ioctl may
145 take a long time to execute on large files, and it is interruptible by
146 fatal signals.
147 
148 FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY checks for write access to the inode.  However,
149 it must be executed on an O_RDONLY file descriptor and no processes
150 can have the file open for writing.  Attempts to open the file for
151 writing while this ioctl is executing will fail with ETXTBSY.  (This
152 is necessary to guarantee that no writable file descriptors will exist
153 after verity is enabled, and to guarantee that the file's contents are
154 stable while the Merkle tree is being built over it.)
155 
156 On success, FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY returns 0, and the file becomes a
157 verity file.  On failure (including the case of interruption by a
158 fatal signal), no changes are made to the file.
159 
160 FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
161 
162 - ``EACCES``: the process does not have write access to the file
163 - ``EBADMSG``: the builtin signature is malformed
164 - ``EBUSY``: this ioctl is already running on the file
165 - ``EEXIST``: the file already has verity enabled
166 - ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
167 - ``EFBIG``: the file is too large to enable verity on
168 - ``EINTR``: the operation was interrupted by a fatal signal
169 - ``EINVAL``: unsupported version, hash algorithm, or block size; or
170   reserved bits are set; or the file descriptor refers to neither a
171   regular file nor a directory.
172 - ``EISDIR``: the file descriptor refers to a directory
173 - ``EKEYREJECTED``: the builtin signature doesn't match the file
174 - ``EMSGSIZE``: the salt or builtin signature is too long
175 - ``ENOKEY``: the ".fs-verity" keyring doesn't contain the certificate
176   needed to verify the builtin signature
177 - ``ENOPKG``: fs-verity recognizes the hash algorithm, but it's not
178   available in the kernel's crypto API as currently configured (e.g.
179   for SHA-512, missing CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512).
180 - ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
181 - ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
182   support; or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
183   feature enabled on it; or the filesystem does not support fs-verity
184   on this file.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
185 - ``EPERM``: the file is append-only; or, a builtin signature is
186   required and one was not provided.
187 - ``EROFS``: the filesystem is read-only
188 - ``ETXTBSY``: someone has the file open for writing.  This can be the
189   caller's file descriptor, another open file descriptor, or the file
190   reference held by a writable memory map.
191 
192 FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY
193 ---------------------
194 
195 The FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY ioctl retrieves the digest of a verity file.
196 The fs-verity file digest is a cryptographic digest that identifies
197 the file contents that are being enforced on reads; it is computed via
198 a Merkle tree and is different from a traditional full-file digest.
199 
200 This ioctl takes in a pointer to a variable-length structure::
201 
202     struct fsverity_digest {
203             __u16 digest_algorithm;
204             __u16 digest_size; /* input/output */
205             __u8 digest[];
206     };
207 
208 ``digest_size`` is an input/output field.  On input, it must be
209 initialized to the number of bytes allocated for the variable-length
210 ``digest`` field.
211 
212 On success, 0 is returned and the kernel fills in the structure as
213 follows:
214 
215 - ``digest_algorithm`` will be the hash algorithm used for the file
216   digest.  It will match ``fsverity_enable_arg::hash_algorithm``.
217 - ``digest_size`` will be the size of the digest in bytes, e.g. 32
218   for SHA-256.  (This can be redundant with ``digest_algorithm``.)
219 - ``digest`` will be the actual bytes of the digest.
220 
221 FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY is guaranteed to execute in constant time,
222 regardless of the size of the file.
223 
224 FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
225 
226 - ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
227 - ``ENODATA``: the file is not a verity file
228 - ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
229 - ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
230   support, or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
231   feature enabled on it.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
232 - ``EOVERFLOW``: the digest is longer than the specified
233   ``digest_size`` bytes.  Try providing a larger buffer.
234 
235 FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA
236 ---------------------------
237 
238 The FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA ioctl reads verity metadata from a
239 verity file.  This ioctl is available since Linux v5.12.
240 
241 This ioctl allows writing a server program that takes a verity file
242 and serves it to a client program, such that the client can do its own
243 fs-verity compatible verification of the file.  This only makes sense
244 if the client doesn't trust the server and if the server needs to
245 provide the storage for the client.
246 
247 This is a fairly specialized use case, and most fs-verity users won't
248 need this ioctl.
249 
250 This ioctl takes in a pointer to the following structure::
251 
252    #define FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_MERKLE_TREE     1
253    #define FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR      2
254    #define FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_SIGNATURE       3
255 
256    struct fsverity_read_metadata_arg {
257            __u64 metadata_type;
258            __u64 offset;
259            __u64 length;
260            __u64 buf_ptr;
261            __u64 __reserved;
262    };
263 
264 ``metadata_type`` specifies the type of metadata to read:
265 
266 - ``FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_MERKLE_TREE`` reads the blocks of the
267   Merkle tree.  The blocks are returned in order from the root level
268   to the leaf level.  Within each level, the blocks are returned in
269   the same order that their hashes are themselves hashed.
270   See `Merkle tree`_ for more information.
271 
272 - ``FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR`` reads the fs-verity
273   descriptor.  See `fs-verity descriptor`_.
274 
275 - ``FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_SIGNATURE`` reads the builtin signature
276   which was passed to FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY, if any.  See `Built-in
277   signature verification`_.
278 
279 The semantics are similar to those of ``pread()``.  ``offset``
280 specifies the offset in bytes into the metadata item to read from, and
281 ``length`` specifies the maximum number of bytes to read from the
282 metadata item.  ``buf_ptr`` is the pointer to the buffer to read into,
283 cast to a 64-bit integer.  ``__reserved`` must be 0.  On success, the
284 number of bytes read is returned.  0 is returned at the end of the
285 metadata item.  The returned length may be less than ``length``, for
286 example if the ioctl is interrupted.
287 
288 The metadata returned by FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA isn't guaranteed
289 to be authenticated against the file digest that would be returned by
290 `FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_, as the metadata is expected to be used to
291 implement fs-verity compatible verification anyway (though absent a
292 malicious disk, the metadata will indeed match).  E.g. to implement
293 this ioctl, the filesystem is allowed to just read the Merkle tree
294 blocks from disk without actually verifying the path to the root node.
295 
296 FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA can fail with the following errors:
297 
298 - ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
299 - ``EINTR``: the ioctl was interrupted before any data was read
300 - ``EINVAL``: reserved fields were set, or ``offset + length``
301   overflowed
302 - ``ENODATA``: the file is not a verity file, or
303   FS_VERITY_METADATA_TYPE_SIGNATURE was requested but the file doesn't
304   have a builtin signature
305 - ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity, or
306   this ioctl is not yet implemented on it
307 - ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
308   support, or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
309   feature enabled on it.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
310 
311 FS_IOC_GETFLAGS
312 ---------------
313 
314 The existing ioctl FS_IOC_GETFLAGS (which isn't specific to fs-verity)
315 can also be used to check whether a file has fs-verity enabled or not.
316 To do so, check for FS_VERITY_FL (0x00100000) in the returned flags.
317 
318 The verity flag is not settable via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS.  You must use
319 FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY instead, since parameters must be provided.
320 
321 statx
322 -----
323 
324 Since Linux v5.5, the statx() system call sets STATX_ATTR_VERITY if
325 the file has fs-verity enabled.  This can perform better than
326 FS_IOC_GETFLAGS and FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY because it doesn't require
327 opening the file, and opening verity files can be expensive.
328 
329 .. _accessing_verity_files:
330 
331 Accessing verity files
332 ======================
333 
334 Applications can transparently access a verity file just like a
335 non-verity one, with the following exceptions:
336 
337 - Verity files are readonly.  They cannot be opened for writing or
338   truncate()d, even if the file mode bits allow it.  Attempts to do
339   one of these things will fail with EPERM.  However, changes to
340   metadata such as owner, mode, timestamps, and xattrs are still
341   allowed, since these are not measured by fs-verity.  Verity files
342   can also still be renamed, deleted, and linked to.
343 
344 - Direct I/O is not supported on verity files.  Attempts to use direct
345   I/O on such files will fall back to buffered I/O.
346 
347 - DAX (Direct Access) is not supported on verity files, because this
348   would circumvent the data verification.
349 
350 - Reads of data that doesn't match the verity Merkle tree will fail
351   with EIO (for read()) or SIGBUS (for mmap() reads).
352 
353 - If the sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is set to 1 and the
354   file is not signed by a key in the ".fs-verity" keyring, then
355   opening the file will fail.  See `Built-in signature verification`_.
356 
357 Direct access to the Merkle tree is not supported.  Therefore, if a
358 verity file is copied, or is backed up and restored, then it will lose
359 its "verity"-ness.  fs-verity is primarily meant for files like
360 executables that are managed by a package manager.
361 
362 File digest computation
363 =======================
364 
365 This section describes how fs-verity hashes the file contents using a
366 Merkle tree to produce the digest which cryptographically identifies
367 the file contents.  This algorithm is the same for all filesystems
368 that support fs-verity.
369 
370 Userspace only needs to be aware of this algorithm if it needs to
371 compute fs-verity file digests itself, e.g. in order to sign files.
372 
373 .. _fsverity_merkle_tree:
374 
375 Merkle tree
376 -----------
377 
378 The file contents is divided into blocks, where the block size is
379 configurable but is usually 4096 bytes.  The end of the last block is
380 zero-padded if needed.  Each block is then hashed, producing the first
381 level of hashes.  Then, the hashes in this first level are grouped
382 into 'blocksize'-byte blocks (zero-padding the ends as needed) and
383 these blocks are hashed, producing the second level of hashes.  This
384 proceeds up the tree until only a single block remains.  The hash of
385 this block is the "Merkle tree root hash".
386 
387 If the file fits in one block and is nonempty, then the "Merkle tree
388 root hash" is simply the hash of the single data block.  If the file
389 is empty, then the "Merkle tree root hash" is all zeroes.
390 
391 The "blocks" here are not necessarily the same as "filesystem blocks".
392 
393 If a salt was specified, then it's zero-padded to the closest multiple
394 of the input size of the hash algorithm's compression function, e.g.
395 64 bytes for SHA-256 or 128 bytes for SHA-512.  The padded salt is
396 prepended to every data or Merkle tree block that is hashed.
397 
398 The purpose of the block padding is to cause every hash to be taken
399 over the same amount of data, which simplifies the implementation and
400 keeps open more possibilities for hardware acceleration.  The purpose
401 of the salt padding is to make the salting "free" when the salted hash
402 state is precomputed, then imported for each hash.
403 
404 Example: in the recommended configuration of SHA-256 and 4K blocks,
405 128 hash values fit in each block.  Thus, each level of the Merkle
406 tree is approximately 128 times smaller than the previous, and for
407 large files the Merkle tree's size converges to approximately 1/127 of
408 the original file size.  However, for small files, the padding is
409 significant, making the space overhead proportionally more.
410 
411 .. _fsverity_descriptor:
412 
413 fs-verity descriptor
414 --------------------
415 
416 By itself, the Merkle tree root hash is ambiguous.  For example, it
417 can't a distinguish a large file from a small second file whose data
418 is exactly the top-level hash block of the first file.  Ambiguities
419 also arise from the convention of padding to the next block boundary.
420 
421 To solve this problem, the fs-verity file digest is actually computed
422 as a hash of the following structure, which contains the Merkle tree
423 root hash as well as other fields such as the file size::
424 
425     struct fsverity_descriptor {
426             __u8 version;           /* must be 1 */
427             __u8 hash_algorithm;    /* Merkle tree hash algorithm */
428             __u8 log_blocksize;     /* log2 of size of data and tree blocks */
429             __u8 salt_size;         /* size of salt in bytes; 0 if none */
430             __le32 __reserved_0x04; /* must be 0 */
431             __le64 data_size;       /* size of file the Merkle tree is built over */
432             __u8 root_hash[64];     /* Merkle tree root hash */
433             __u8 salt[32];          /* salt prepended to each hashed block */
434             __u8 __reserved[144];   /* must be 0's */
435     };
436 
437 Built-in signature verification
438 ===============================
439 
440 CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES=y adds supports for in-kernel
441 verification of fs-verity builtin signatures.
442 
443 **IMPORTANT**!  Please take great care before using this feature.
444 It is not the only way to do signatures with fs-verity, and the
445 alternatives (such as userspace signature verification, and IMA
446 appraisal) can be much better.  It's also easy to fall into a trap
447 of thinking this feature solves more problems than it actually does.
448 
449 Enabling this option adds the following:
450 
451 1. At boot time, the kernel creates a keyring named ".fs-verity".  The
452    root user can add trusted X.509 certificates to this keyring using
453    the add_key() system call.
454 
455 2. `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_ accepts a pointer to a PKCS#7 formatted
456    detached signature in DER format of the file's fs-verity digest.
457    On success, the ioctl persists the signature alongside the Merkle
458    tree.  Then, any time the file is opened, the kernel verifies the
459    file's actual digest against this signature, using the certificates
460    in the ".fs-verity" keyring.
461 
462 3. A new sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is made available.
463    When set to 1, the kernel requires that all verity files have a
464    correctly signed digest as described in (2).
465 
466 The data that the signature as described in (2) must be a signature of
467 is the fs-verity file digest in the following format::
468 
469     struct fsverity_formatted_digest {
470             char magic[8];                  /* must be "FSVerity" */
471             __le16 digest_algorithm;
472             __le16 digest_size;
473             __u8 digest[];
474     };
475 
476 That's it.  It should be emphasized again that fs-verity builtin
477 signatures are not the only way to do signatures with fs-verity.  See
478 `Use cases`_ for an overview of ways in which fs-verity can be used.
479 fs-verity builtin signatures have some major limitations that should
480 be carefully considered before using them:
481 
482 - Builtin signature verification does *not* make the kernel enforce
483   that any files actually have fs-verity enabled.  Thus, it is not a
484   complete authentication policy.  Currently, if it is used, the only
485   way to complete the authentication policy is for trusted userspace
486   code to explicitly check whether files have fs-verity enabled with a
487   signature before they are accessed.  (With
488   fs.verity.require_signatures=1, just checking whether fs-verity is
489   enabled suffices.)  But, in this case the trusted userspace code
490   could just store the signature alongside the file and verify it
491   itself using a cryptographic library, instead of using this feature.
492 
493 - A file's builtin signature can only be set at the same time that
494   fs-verity is being enabled on the file.  Changing or deleting the
495   builtin signature later requires re-creating the file.
496 
497 - Builtin signature verification uses the same set of public keys for
498   all fs-verity enabled files on the system.  Different keys cannot be
499   trusted for different files; each key is all or nothing.
500 
501 - The sysctl fs.verity.require_signatures applies system-wide.
502   Setting it to 1 only works when all users of fs-verity on the system
503   agree that it should be set to 1.  This limitation can prevent
504   fs-verity from being used in cases where it would be helpful.
505 
506 - Builtin signature verification can only use signature algorithms
507   that are supported by the kernel.  For example, the kernel does not
508   yet support Ed25519, even though this is often the signature
509   algorithm that is recommended for new cryptographic designs.
510 
511 - fs-verity builtin signatures are in PKCS#7 format, and the public
512   keys are in X.509 format.  These formats are commonly used,
513   including by some other kernel features (which is why the fs-verity
514   builtin signatures use them), and are very feature rich.
515   Unfortunately, history has shown that code that parses and handles
516   these formats (which are from the 1990s and are based on ASN.1)
517   often has vulnerabilities as a result of their complexity.  This
518   complexity is not inherent to the cryptography itself.
519 
520   fs-verity users who do not need advanced features of X.509 and
521   PKCS#7 should strongly consider using simpler formats, such as plain
522   Ed25519 keys and signatures, and verifying signatures in userspace.
523 
524   fs-verity users who choose to use X.509 and PKCS#7 anyway should
525   still consider that verifying those signatures in userspace is more
526   flexible (for other reasons mentioned earlier in this document) and
527   eliminates the need to enable CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES
528   and its associated increase in kernel attack surface.  In some cases
529   it can even be necessary, since advanced X.509 and PKCS#7 features
530   do not always work as intended with the kernel.  For example, the
531   kernel does not check X.509 certificate validity times.
532 
533   Note: IMA appraisal, which supports fs-verity, does not use PKCS#7
534   for its signatures, so it partially avoids the issues discussed
535   here.  IMA appraisal does use X.509.
536 
537 Filesystem support
538 ==================
539 
540 fs-verity is supported by several filesystems, described below.  The
541 CONFIG_FS_VERITY kconfig option must be enabled to use fs-verity on
542 any of these filesystems.
543 
544 ``include/linux/fsverity.h`` declares the interface between the
545 ``fs/verity/`` support layer and filesystems.  Briefly, filesystems
546 must provide an ``fsverity_operations`` structure that provides
547 methods to read and write the verity metadata to a filesystem-specific
548 location, including the Merkle tree blocks and
549 ``fsverity_descriptor``.  Filesystems must also call functions in
550 ``fs/verity/`` at certain times, such as when a file is opened or when
551 pages have been read into the pagecache.  (See `Verifying data`_.)
552 
553 ext4
554 ----
555 
556 ext4 supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and e2fsprogs v1.45.2.
557 
558 To create verity files on an ext4 filesystem, the filesystem must have
559 been formatted with ``-O verity`` or had ``tune2fs -O verity`` run on
560 it.  "verity" is an RO_COMPAT filesystem feature, so once set, old
561 kernels will only be able to mount the filesystem readonly, and old
562 versions of e2fsck will be unable to check the filesystem.
563 
564 Originally, an ext4 filesystem with the "verity" feature could only be
565 mounted when its block size was equal to the system page size
566 (typically 4096 bytes).  In Linux v6.3, this limitation was removed.
567 
568 ext4 sets the EXT4_VERITY_FL on-disk inode flag on verity files.  It
569 can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be cleared.
570 
571 ext4 also supports encryption, which can be used simultaneously with
572 fs-verity.  In this case, the plaintext data is verified rather than
573 the ciphertext.  This is necessary in order to make the fs-verity file
574 digest meaningful, since every file is encrypted differently.
575 
576 ext4 stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and fsverity_descriptor)
577 past the end of the file, starting at the first 64K boundary beyond
578 i_size.  This approach works because (a) verity files are readonly,
579 and (b) pages fully beyond i_size aren't visible to userspace but can
580 be read/written internally by ext4 with only some relatively small
581 changes to ext4.  This approach avoids having to depend on the
582 EA_INODE feature and on rearchitecturing ext4's xattr support to
583 support paging multi-gigabyte xattrs into memory, and to support
584 encrypting xattrs.  Note that the verity metadata *must* be encrypted
585 when the file is, since it contains hashes of the plaintext data.
586 
587 ext4 only allows verity on extent-based files.
588 
589 f2fs
590 ----
591 
592 f2fs supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and f2fs-tools v1.11.0.
593 
594 To create verity files on an f2fs filesystem, the filesystem must have
595 been formatted with ``-O verity``.
596 
597 f2fs sets the FADVISE_VERITY_BIT on-disk inode flag on verity files.
598 It can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be
599 cleared.
600 
601 Like ext4, f2fs stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and
602 fsverity_descriptor) past the end of the file, starting at the first
603 64K boundary beyond i_size.  See explanation for ext4 above.
604 Moreover, f2fs supports at most 4096 bytes of xattr entries per inode
605 which usually wouldn't be enough for even a single Merkle tree block.
606 
607 f2fs doesn't support enabling verity on files that currently have
608 atomic or volatile writes pending.
609 
610 btrfs
611 -----
612 
613 btrfs supports fs-verity since Linux v5.15.  Verity-enabled inodes are
614 marked with a RO_COMPAT inode flag, and the verity metadata is stored
615 in separate btree items.
616 
617 Implementation details
618 ======================
619 
620 Verifying data
621 --------------
622 
623 fs-verity ensures that all reads of a verity file's data are verified,
624 regardless of which syscall is used to do the read (e.g. mmap(),
625 read(), pread()) and regardless of whether it's the first read or a
626 later read (unless the later read can return cached data that was
627 already verified).  Below, we describe how filesystems implement this.
628 
629 Pagecache
630 ~~~~~~~~~
631 
632 For filesystems using Linux's pagecache, the ``->read_folio()`` and
633 ``->readahead()`` methods must be modified to verify folios before
634 they are marked Uptodate.  Merely hooking ``->read_iter()`` would be
635 insufficient, since ``->read_iter()`` is not used for memory maps.
636 
637 Therefore, fs/verity/ provides the function fsverity_verify_blocks()
638 which verifies data that has been read into the pagecache of a verity
639 inode.  The containing folio must still be locked and not Uptodate, so
640 it's not yet readable by userspace.  As needed to do the verification,
641 fsverity_verify_blocks() will call back into the filesystem to read
642 hash blocks via fsverity_operations::read_merkle_tree_page().
643 
644 fsverity_verify_blocks() returns false if verification failed; in this
645 case, the filesystem must not set the folio Uptodate.  Following this,
646 as per the usual Linux pagecache behavior, attempts by userspace to
647 read() from the part of the file containing the folio will fail with
648 EIO, and accesses to the folio within a memory map will raise SIGBUS.
649 
650 In principle, verifying a data block requires verifying the entire
651 path in the Merkle tree from the data block to the root hash.
652 However, for efficiency the filesystem may cache the hash blocks.
653 Therefore, fsverity_verify_blocks() only ascends the tree reading hash
654 blocks until an already-verified hash block is seen.  It then verifies
655 the path to that block.
656 
657 This optimization, which is also used by dm-verity, results in
658 excellent sequential read performance.  This is because usually (e.g.
659 127 in 128 times for 4K blocks and SHA-256) the hash block from the
660 bottom level of the tree will already be cached and checked from
661 reading a previous data block.  However, random reads perform worse.
662 
663 Block device based filesystems
664 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
665 
666 Block device based filesystems (e.g. ext4 and f2fs) in Linux also use
667 the pagecache, so the above subsection applies too.  However, they
668 also usually read many data blocks from a file at once, grouped into a
669 structure called a "bio".  To make it easier for these types of
670 filesystems to support fs-verity, fs/verity/ also provides a function
671 fsverity_verify_bio() which verifies all data blocks in a bio.
672 
673 ext4 and f2fs also support encryption.  If a verity file is also
674 encrypted, the data must be decrypted before being verified.  To
675 support this, these filesystems allocate a "post-read context" for
676 each bio and store it in ``->bi_private``::
677 
678     struct bio_post_read_ctx {
679            struct bio *bio;
680            struct work_struct work;
681            unsigned int cur_step;
682            unsigned int enabled_steps;
683     };
684 
685 ``enabled_steps`` is a bitmask that specifies whether decryption,
686 verity, or both is enabled.  After the bio completes, for each needed
687 postprocessing step the filesystem enqueues the bio_post_read_ctx on a
688 workqueue, and then the workqueue work does the decryption or
689 verification.  Finally, folios where no decryption or verity error
690 occurred are marked Uptodate, and the folios are unlocked.
691 
692 On many filesystems, files can contain holes.  Normally,
693 ``->readahead()`` simply zeroes hole blocks and considers the
694 corresponding data to be up-to-date; no bios are issued.  To prevent
695 this case from bypassing fs-verity, filesystems use
696 fsverity_verify_blocks() to verify hole blocks.
697 
698 Filesystems also disable direct I/O on verity files, since otherwise
699 direct I/O would bypass fs-verity.
700 
701 Userspace utility
702 =================
703 
704 This document focuses on the kernel, but a userspace utility for
705 fs-verity can be found at:
706 
707         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/fsverity-utils.git
708 
709 See the README.md file in the fsverity-utils source tree for details,
710 including examples of setting up fs-verity protected files.
711 
712 Tests
713 =====
714 
715 To test fs-verity, use xfstests.  For example, using `kvm-xfstests
716 <https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/kvm-quickstart.md>`_::
717 
718     kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs,btrfs -g verity
719 
720 FAQ
721 ===
722 
723 This section answers frequently asked questions about fs-verity that
724 weren't already directly answered in other parts of this document.
725 
726 :Q: Why isn't fs-verity part of IMA?
727 :A: fs-verity and IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) have
728     different focuses.  fs-verity is a filesystem-level mechanism for
729     hashing individual files using a Merkle tree.  In contrast, IMA
730     specifies a system-wide policy that specifies which files are
731     hashed and what to do with those hashes, such as log them,
732     authenticate them, or add them to a measurement list.
733 
734     IMA supports the fs-verity hashing mechanism as an alternative
735     to full file hashes, for those who want the performance and
736     security benefits of the Merkle tree based hash.  However, it
737     doesn't make sense to force all uses of fs-verity to be through
738     IMA.  fs-verity already meets many users' needs even as a
739     standalone filesystem feature, and it's testable like other
740     filesystem features e.g. with xfstests.
741 
742 :Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just modify the
743     hashes in the Merkle tree, which is stored on-disk?
744 :A: To verify the authenticity of an fs-verity file you must verify
745     the authenticity of the "fs-verity file digest", which
746     incorporates the root hash of the Merkle tree.  See `Use cases`_.
747 
748 :Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just replace a
749     verity file with a non-verity one?
750 :A: See `Use cases`_.  In the initial use case, it's really trusted
751     userspace code that authenticates the files; fs-verity is just a
752     tool to do this job efficiently and securely.  The trusted
753     userspace code will consider non-verity files to be inauthentic.
754 
755 :Q: Why does the Merkle tree need to be stored on-disk?  Couldn't you
756     store just the root hash?
757 :A: If the Merkle tree wasn't stored on-disk, then you'd have to
758     compute the entire tree when the file is first accessed, even if
759     just one byte is being read.  This is a fundamental consequence of
760     how Merkle tree hashing works.  To verify a leaf node, you need to
761     verify the whole path to the root hash, including the root node
762     (the thing which the root hash is a hash of).  But if the root
763     node isn't stored on-disk, you have to compute it by hashing its
764     children, and so on until you've actually hashed the entire file.
765 
766     That defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash,
767     since if you have to hash the whole file ahead of time anyway,
768     then you could simply do sha256(file) instead.  That would be much
769     simpler, and a bit faster too.
770 
771     It's true that an in-memory Merkle tree could still provide the
772     advantage of verification on every read rather than just on the
773     first read.  However, it would be inefficient because every time a
774     hash page gets evicted (you can't pin the entire Merkle tree into
775     memory, since it may be very large), in order to restore it you
776     again need to hash everything below it in the tree.  This again
777     defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash, since
778     a single block read could trigger re-hashing gigabytes of data.
779 
780 :Q: But couldn't you store just the leaf nodes and compute the rest?
781 :A: See previous answer; this really just moves up one level, since
782     one could alternatively interpret the data blocks as being the
783     leaf nodes of the Merkle tree.  It's true that the tree can be
784     computed much faster if the leaf level is stored rather than just
785     the data, but that's only because each level is less than 1% the
786     size of the level below (assuming the recommended settings of
787     SHA-256 and 4K blocks).  For the exact same reason, by storing
788     "just the leaf nodes" you'd already be storing over 99% of the
789     tree, so you might as well simply store the whole tree.
790 
791 :Q: Can the Merkle tree be built ahead of time, e.g. distributed as
792     part of a package that is installed to many computers?
793 :A: This isn't currently supported.  It was part of the original
794     design, but was removed to simplify the kernel UAPI and because it
795     wasn't a critical use case.  Files are usually installed once and
796     used many times, and cryptographic hashing is somewhat fast on
797     most modern processors.
798 
799 :Q: Why doesn't fs-verity support writes?
800 :A: Write support would be very difficult and would require a
801     completely different design, so it's well outside the scope of
802     fs-verity.  Write support would require:
803 
804     - A way to maintain consistency between the data and hashes,
805       including all levels of hashes, since corruption after a crash
806       (especially of potentially the entire file!) is unacceptable.
807       The main options for solving this are data journalling,
808       copy-on-write, and log-structured volume.  But it's very hard to
809       retrofit existing filesystems with new consistency mechanisms.
810       Data journalling is available on ext4, but is very slow.
811 
812     - Rebuilding the Merkle tree after every write, which would be
813       extremely inefficient.  Alternatively, a different authenticated
814       dictionary structure such as an "authenticated skiplist" could
815       be used.  However, this would be far more complex.
816 
817     Compare it to dm-verity vs. dm-integrity.  dm-verity is very
818     simple: the kernel just verifies read-only data against a
819     read-only Merkle tree.  In contrast, dm-integrity supports writes
820     but is slow, is much more complex, and doesn't actually support
821     full-device authentication since it authenticates each sector
822     independently, i.e. there is no "root hash".  It doesn't really
823     make sense for the same device-mapper target to support these two
824     very different cases; the same applies to fs-verity.
825 
826 :Q: Since verity files are immutable, why isn't the immutable bit set?
827 :A: The existing "immutable" bit (FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) already has a
828     specific set of semantics which not only make the file contents
829     read-only, but also prevent the file from being deleted, renamed,
830     linked to, or having its owner or mode changed.  These extra
831     properties are unwanted for fs-verity, so reusing the immutable
832     bit isn't appropriate.
833 
834 :Q: Why does the API use ioctls instead of setxattr() and getxattr()?
835 :A: Abusing the xattr interface for basically arbitrary syscalls is
836     heavily frowned upon by most of the Linux filesystem developers.
837     An xattr should really just be an xattr on-disk, not an API to
838     e.g. magically trigger construction of a Merkle tree.
839 
840 :Q: Does fs-verity support remote filesystems?
841 :A: So far all filesystems that have implemented fs-verity support are
842     local filesystems, but in principle any filesystem that can store
843     per-file verity metadata can support fs-verity, regardless of
844     whether it's local or remote.  Some filesystems may have fewer
845     options of where to store the verity metadata; one possibility is
846     to store it past the end of the file and "hide" it from userspace
847     by manipulating i_size.  The data verification functions provided
848     by ``fs/verity/`` also assume that the filesystem uses the Linux
849     pagecache, but both local and remote filesystems normally do so.
850 
851 :Q: Why is anything filesystem-specific at all?  Shouldn't fs-verity
852     be implemented entirely at the VFS level?
853 :A: There are many reasons why this is not possible or would be very
854     difficult, including the following:
855 
856     - To prevent bypassing verification, folios must not be marked
857       Uptodate until they've been verified.  Currently, each
858       filesystem is responsible for marking folios Uptodate via
859       ``->readahead()``.  Therefore, currently it's not possible for
860       the VFS to do the verification on its own.  Changing this would
861       require significant changes to the VFS and all filesystems.
862 
863     - It would require defining a filesystem-independent way to store
864       the verity metadata.  Extended attributes don't work for this
865       because (a) the Merkle tree may be gigabytes, but many
866       filesystems assume that all xattrs fit into a single 4K
867       filesystem block, and (b) ext4 and f2fs encryption doesn't
868       encrypt xattrs, yet the Merkle tree *must* be encrypted when the
869       file contents are, because it stores hashes of the plaintext
870       file contents.
871 
872       So the verity metadata would have to be stored in an actual
873       file.  Using a separate file would be very ugly, since the
874       metadata is fundamentally part of the file to be protected, and
875       it could cause problems where users could delete the real file
876       but not the metadata file or vice versa.  On the other hand,
877       having it be in the same file would break applications unless
878       filesystems' notion of i_size were divorced from the VFS's,
879       which would be complex and require changes to all filesystems.
880 
881     - It's desirable that FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY uses the filesystem's
882       transaction mechanism so that either the file ends up with
883       verity enabled, or no changes were made.  Allowing intermediate
884       states to occur after a crash may cause problems.

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php