~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst

Version: ~ [ linux-6.12-rc7 ] ~ [ linux-6.11.7 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.60 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.116 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.171 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.229 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.285 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.323 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.12 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

  1 .. _securitybugs:
  2 
  3 Security bugs
  4 =============
  5 
  6 Linux kernel developers take security very seriously.  As such, we'd
  7 like to know when a security bug is found so that it can be fixed and
  8 disclosed as quickly as possible.  Please report security bugs to the
  9 Linux kernel security team.
 10 
 11 Contact
 12 -------
 13 
 14 The Linux kernel security team can be contacted by email at
 15 <security@kernel.org>.  This is a private list of security officers
 16 who will help verify the bug report and develop and release a fix.
 17 If you already have a fix, please include it with your report, as
 18 that can speed up the process considerably.  It is possible that the
 19 security team will bring in extra help from area maintainers to
 20 understand and fix the security vulnerability.
 21 
 22 As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it
 23 will be to diagnose and fix.  Please review the procedure outlined in
 24 'Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst' if you are unclear about what
 25 information is helpful.  Any exploit code is very helpful and will not
 26 be released without consent from the reporter unless it has already been
 27 made public.
 28 
 29 Please send plain text emails without attachments where possible.
 30 It is much harder to have a context-quoted discussion about a complex
 31 issue if all the details are hidden away in attachments.  Think of it like a
 32 :doc:`regular patch submission <../process/submitting-patches>`
 33 (even if you don't have a patch yet): describe the problem and impact, list
 34 reproduction steps, and follow it with a proposed fix, all in plain text.
 35 
 36 Disclosure and embargoed information
 37 ------------------------------------
 38 
 39 The security list is not a disclosure channel.  For that, see Coordination
 40 below.
 41 
 42 Once a robust fix has been developed, the release process starts.  Fixes
 43 for publicly known bugs are released immediately.
 44 
 45 Although our preference is to release fixes for publicly undisclosed bugs
 46 as soon as they become available, this may be postponed at the request of
 47 the reporter or an affected party for up to 7 calendar days from the start
 48 of the release process, with an exceptional extension to 14 calendar days
 49 if it is agreed that the criticality of the bug requires more time.  The
 50 only valid reason for deferring the publication of a fix is to accommodate
 51 the logistics of QA and large scale rollouts which require release
 52 coordination.
 53 
 54 While embargoed information may be shared with trusted individuals in
 55 order to develop a fix, such information will not be published alongside
 56 the fix or on any other disclosure channel without the permission of the
 57 reporter.  This includes but is not limited to the original bug report
 58 and followup discussions (if any), exploits, CVE information or the
 59 identity of the reporter.
 60 
 61 In other words our only interest is in getting bugs fixed.  All other
 62 information submitted to the security list and any followup discussions
 63 of the report are treated confidentially even after the embargo has been
 64 lifted, in perpetuity.
 65 
 66 Coordination with other groups
 67 ------------------------------
 68 
 69 While the kernel security team solely focuses on getting bugs fixed,
 70 other groups focus on fixing issues in distros and coordinating
 71 disclosure between operating system vendors.  Coordination is usually
 72 handled by the "linux-distros" mailing list and disclosure by the
 73 public "oss-security" mailing list, both of which are closely related
 74 and presented in the linux-distros wiki:
 75 <https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros>
 76 
 77 Please note that the respective policies and rules are different since
 78 the 3 lists pursue different goals.  Coordinating between the kernel
 79 security team and other teams is difficult since for the kernel security
 80 team occasional embargoes (as subject to a maximum allowed number of
 81 days) start from the availability of a fix, while for "linux-distros"
 82 they start from the initial post to the list regardless of the
 83 availability of a fix.
 84 
 85 As such, the kernel security team strongly recommends that as a reporter
 86 of a potential security issue you DO NOT contact the "linux-distros"
 87 mailing list UNTIL a fix is accepted by the affected code's maintainers
 88 and you have read the distros wiki page above and you fully understand
 89 the requirements that contacting "linux-distros" will impose on you and
 90 the kernel community.  This also means that in general it doesn't make
 91 sense to Cc: both lists at once, except maybe for coordination if and
 92 while an accepted fix has not yet been merged.  In other words, until a
 93 fix is accepted do not Cc: "linux-distros", and after it's merged do not
 94 Cc: the kernel security team.
 95 
 96 CVE assignment
 97 --------------
 98 
 99 The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for
100 reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may
101 delay the bug handling.  If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier
102 assigned for a confirmed issue, they can contact the :doc:`kernel CVE
103 assignment team<../process/cve>` to obtain one.
104 
105 Non-disclosure agreements
106 -------------------------
107 
108 The Linux kernel security team is not a formal body and therefore unable
109 to enter any non-disclosure agreements.

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php