~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst

Version: ~ [ linux-6.12-rc7 ] ~ [ linux-6.11.7 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.60 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.116 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.171 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.229 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.285 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.323 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.12 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

  1 ===================================================================
  2 delays - Information on the various kernel delay / sleep mechanisms
  3 ===================================================================
  4 
  5 This document seeks to answer the common question: "What is the
  6 RightWay (TM) to insert a delay?"
  7 
  8 This question is most often faced by driver writers who have to
  9 deal with hardware delays and who may not be the most intimately
 10 familiar with the inner workings of the Linux Kernel.
 11 
 12 
 13 Inserting Delays
 14 ----------------
 15 
 16 The first, and most important, question you need to ask is "Is my
 17 code in an atomic context?"  This should be followed closely by "Does
 18 it really need to delay in atomic context?" If so...
 19 
 20 ATOMIC CONTEXT:
 21         You must use the `*delay` family of functions. These
 22         functions use the jiffy estimation of clock speed
 23         and will busy wait for enough loop cycles to achieve
 24         the desired delay:
 25 
 26         ndelay(unsigned long nsecs)
 27         udelay(unsigned long usecs)
 28         mdelay(unsigned long msecs)
 29 
 30         udelay is the generally preferred API; ndelay-level
 31         precision may not actually exist on many non-PC devices.
 32 
 33         mdelay is macro wrapper around udelay, to account for
 34         possible overflow when passing large arguments to udelay.
 35         In general, use of mdelay is discouraged and code should
 36         be refactored to allow for the use of msleep.
 37 
 38 NON-ATOMIC CONTEXT:
 39         You should use the `*sleep[_range]` family of functions.
 40         There are a few more options here, while any of them may
 41         work correctly, using the "right" sleep function will
 42         help the scheduler, power management, and just make your
 43         driver better :)
 44 
 45         -- Backed by busy-wait loop:
 46 
 47                 udelay(unsigned long usecs)
 48 
 49         -- Backed by hrtimers:
 50 
 51                 usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 52 
 53         -- Backed by jiffies / legacy_timers
 54 
 55                 msleep(unsigned long msecs)
 56                 msleep_interruptible(unsigned long msecs)
 57 
 58         Unlike the `*delay` family, the underlying mechanism
 59         driving each of these calls varies, thus there are
 60         quirks you should be aware of.
 61 
 62 
 63         SLEEPING FOR "A FEW" USECS ( < ~10us? ):
 64                 * Use udelay
 65 
 66                 - Why not usleep?
 67                         On slower systems, (embedded, OR perhaps a speed-
 68                         stepped PC!) the overhead of setting up the hrtimers
 69                         for usleep *may* not be worth it. Such an evaluation
 70                         will obviously depend on your specific situation, but
 71                         it is something to be aware of.
 72 
 73         SLEEPING FOR ~USECS OR SMALL MSECS ( 10us - 20ms):
 74                 * Use usleep_range
 75 
 76                 - Why not msleep for (1ms - 20ms)?
 77                         Explained originally here:
 78                                 https://lore.kernel.org/r/15327.1186166232@lwn.net
 79 
 80                         msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and
 81                         will often sleep longer (~20 ms actual sleep for any
 82                         value given in the 1~20ms range). In many cases this
 83                         is not the desired behavior.
 84 
 85                 - Why is there no "usleep" / What is a good range?
 86                         Since usleep_range is built on top of hrtimers, the
 87                         wakeup will be very precise (ish), thus a simple
 88                         usleep function would likely introduce a large number
 89                         of undesired interrupts.
 90 
 91                         With the introduction of a range, the scheduler is
 92                         free to coalesce your wakeup with any other wakeup
 93                         that may have happened for other reasons, or at the
 94                         worst case, fire an interrupt for your upper bound.
 95 
 96                         The larger a range you supply, the greater a chance
 97                         that you will not trigger an interrupt; this should
 98                         be balanced with what is an acceptable upper bound on
 99                         delay / performance for your specific code path. Exact
100                         tolerances here are very situation specific, thus it
101                         is left to the caller to determine a reasonable range.
102 
103         SLEEPING FOR LARGER MSECS ( 10ms+ )
104                 * Use msleep or possibly msleep_interruptible
105 
106                 - What's the difference?
107                         msleep sets the current task to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
108                         whereas msleep_interruptible sets the current task to
109                         TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before scheduling the sleep. In
110                         short, the difference is whether the sleep can be ended
111                         early by a signal. In general, just use msleep unless
112                         you know you have a need for the interruptible variant.
113 
114         FLEXIBLE SLEEPING (any delay, uninterruptible)
115                 * Use fsleep

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php