~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

TOMOYO Linux Cross Reference
Linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/README

Version: ~ [ linux-6.12-rc7 ] ~ [ linux-6.11.7 ] ~ [ linux-6.10.14 ] ~ [ linux-6.9.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.8.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.7.12 ] ~ [ linux-6.6.60 ] ~ [ linux-6.5.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.4.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.3.13 ] ~ [ linux-6.2.16 ] ~ [ linux-6.1.116 ] ~ [ linux-6.0.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.19.17 ] ~ [ linux-5.18.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.17.15 ] ~ [ linux-5.16.20 ] ~ [ linux-5.15.171 ] ~ [ linux-5.14.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.13.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.12.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.11.22 ] ~ [ linux-5.10.229 ] ~ [ linux-5.9.16 ] ~ [ linux-5.8.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.7.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.6.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.5.19 ] ~ [ linux-5.4.285 ] ~ [ linux-5.3.18 ] ~ [ linux-5.2.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.1.21 ] ~ [ linux-5.0.21 ] ~ [ linux-4.20.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.19.323 ] ~ [ linux-4.18.20 ] ~ [ linux-4.17.19 ] ~ [ linux-4.16.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.15.18 ] ~ [ linux-4.14.336 ] ~ [ linux-4.13.16 ] ~ [ linux-4.12.14 ] ~ [ linux-4.11.12 ] ~ [ linux-4.10.17 ] ~ [ linux-4.9.337 ] ~ [ linux-4.4.302 ] ~ [ linux-3.10.108 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.32.71 ] ~ [ linux-2.6.0 ] ~ [ linux-2.4.37.11 ] ~ [ unix-v6-master ] ~ [ ccs-tools-1.8.12 ] ~ [ policy-sample ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ alpha ] ~ [ m68k ] ~ [ mips ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ sparc ] ~ [ sparc64 ] ~

  1 Motivation
  2 ==========
  3 
  4 One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one
  5 to easily create and test complex environments.
  6 
  7 Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching
  8 ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces
  9 (dev->netns_local) and most of them probably do not support the
 10 L1-separation provided by namespaces.
 11 
 12 However, a similar kind of flexibility can be achieved by using VRFs and
 13 by looping the switch ports together. For example:
 14 
 15                              br0
 16                               +
 17                vrf-h1         |           vrf-h2
 18                  +        +---+----+        +
 19                  |        |        |        |
 20     192.0.2.1/24 +        +        +        + 192.0.2.2/24
 21                swp1     swp2     swp3     swp4
 22                  +        +        +        +
 23                  |        |        |        |
 24                  +--------+        +--------+
 25 
 26 The VRFs act as lightweight namespaces representing hosts connected to
 27 the switch.
 28 
 29 This approach for testing switch ASICs has several advantages over the
 30 traditional method that requires multiple physical machines, to name a
 31 few:
 32 
 33 1. Only the device under test (DUT) is being tested without noise from
 34 other system.
 35 
 36 2. Ability to easily provision complex topologies. Testing bridging
 37 between 4-ports LAGs or 8-way ECMP requires many physical links that are
 38 not always available. With the VRF-based approach one merely needs to
 39 loopback more ports.
 40 
 41 These tests are written with switch ASICs in mind, but they can be run
 42 on any Linux box using veth pairs to emulate physical loopbacks.
 43 
 44 Guidelines for Writing Tests
 45 ============================
 46 
 47 o Where possible, reuse an existing topology for different tests instead
 48   of recreating the same topology.
 49 o Tests that use anything but the most trivial topologies should include
 50   an ASCII art showing the topology.
 51 o Where possible, IPv6 and IPv4 addresses shall conform to RFC 3849 and
 52   RFC 5737, respectively.
 53 o Where possible, tests shall be written so that they can be reused by
 54   multiple topologies and added to lib.sh.
 55 o Checks shall be added to lib.sh for any external dependencies.
 56 o Code shall be checked using ShellCheck [1] prior to submission.
 57 
 58 1. https://www.shellcheck.net/
 59 
 60 Customization
 61 =============
 62 
 63 The forwarding selftests framework uses a number of variables that
 64 influence its behavior and tools it invokes, and how it invokes them, in
 65 various ways. A number of these variables can be overridden. The way these
 66 overridable variables are specified is typically one of the following two
 67 syntaxes:
 68 
 69         : "${VARIABLE:=default_value}"
 70         VARIABLE=${VARIABLE:=default_value}
 71 
 72 Any of these variables can be overridden. Notably net/forwarding/lib.sh and
 73 net/lib.sh contain a number of overridable variables.
 74 
 75 One way of overriding these variables is through the environment:
 76 
 77         PAUSE_ON_FAIL=yes ./some_test.sh
 78 
 79 The variable NETIFS is special. Since it is an array variable, there is no
 80 way to pass it through the environment. Its value can instead be given as
 81 consecutive arguments to the selftest:
 82 
 83         ./some_test.sh swp{1..8}
 84 
 85 A way to customize variables in a persistent fashion is to create a file
 86 named forwarding.config in this directory. lib.sh sources the file if
 87 present, so it can contain any shell code. Typically it will contain
 88 assignments of variables whose value should be overridden.
 89 
 90 forwarding.config.sample is available in the directory as an example of
 91 how forwarding.config might look.

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~

kernel.org | git.kernel.org | LWN.net | Project Home | SVN repository | Mail admin

Linux® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
TOMOYO® is a registered trademark of NTT DATA CORPORATION.

sflogo.php